Obama declared that in the event of chemical weapons being used in Syria, and it seems apparent that they have, then a red line would have been crossed and the USA would feel duty bound to take action.
Will the red line now become pink or will the USA once again get involved? And should they?
The red line
Moderators: DJKeefy, 4u Network
- carrie
- Egyptian Pharaoh
- Posts: 4910
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:46 am
- Location: luxor
- Has thanked: 1860 times
- Been thanked: 2885 times
- Contact:
- Dusak
- Egyptian Pharaoh
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:29 pm
- Location: LUXOR
- Has thanked: 3241 times
- Been thanked: 3812 times
- Gender:
Re: The red line
The only problem with this is that it can't, at the moment, be proven who actually used them. Both sides gain an advantage one way or another. The only suspicion I have at the moment is their refusal to let the international inspectors visit the area. Should he get involved. Should he get America involved? Big gamble, but doable if done from the air against land, which I do not think any country would contemplate at the moment.
Life is your's to do with as you wish- do not let other's try to control it for you. Count Dusak- 1345.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 698 Views
-
Last post by John Landon
-
- 5 Replies
- 604 Views
-
Last post by newcastle
-
- 2 Replies
- 645 Views
-
Last post by FABlux
-
- 19 Replies
- 670 Views
-
Last post by Grandad