Page 1 of 1

Egypt parliament votes to extend Sisi rule until 2030

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 5:18 pm
by DJKeefy
Egypt's parliament overwhelmingly approved constitutional amendments allowing President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to stay in power until 2030. The vote will be followed by a referendum set for April 20-22.

Deputies also backed other sweeping changes to the constitution including to give the military greater influence in political life as well as granting Sisi more control over the judiciary.

The amendments will be put to a public referendum set for April 20-22, said Lashin Ibrahim, head of the National Election Authority said at a press conference.

The announcement came after Egypt's parliament on Tuesday overwhelmingly passed the changes, despite complaints from critics that they are "unconstitutional" and designed to "consolidate authoritarianism".

Parliament speaker Ali Abdel Aal said 531 deputies voted for the amendments and 22 against, according to Al-Ahram.

Sisi led the army's overthrow of elected president Mohamed Morsi in 2013 following mass protests against the Islamist leader's rule.

He won his first term as president in 2014 and was re-elected in March 2018 with more than 97 percent of the vote, after standing virtually unopposed.

His government has been widely criticised by human rights groups for the repression of political opponents.

But Mohamed Abu Hamed, a member of parliament who pushed for the constitutional amendments to keep Sisi in power, was adamant the changes were needed to allow him to complete political and economic reforms.

"The constitution in 2014 was written under tough exceptional circumstances," he told AFP.

The deputy hailed Sisi as a president who "took important political, economic and security measures... (and) must continue with his reforms," in the face of the unrest gripping neighbouring countries.


'Will of the people'

The vote comes after veteran presidents were ousted both in Algeria and Sudan and amid an escalation of the conflict in Libya.

Keeping Sisi in power, he added, reflected "the will of the people".

Al-Ahram's website said MPs carried Egyptian flags as they gathered for the vote inside the parliament while nationalistic songs played in the background.

Wall-to-wall banners and billboards have flooded Cairo's streets in the past few weeks urging people to take part in the referendum.

Many feature slogans implicitly urging people "do the right thing" by voting in favour of the amendments. Others sponsored by the pro-government Nation's Future party call outright for a "Yes" vote.

Such banners have enveloped Cairo's iconic Tahrir Square, the site of the 2011 uprising that toppled longtime ruler Hosni Mubarak.

The amendments were initially introduced in February by a parliamentary bloc supportive of Sisi and updated this week after several rounds of debates.

They extend the presidential term from four to six years but keep it limited to a maximum of two terms.

Prior to the amendments, Egypt's 2014 constitution stipulated two four-year presidential terms.

The 596-seat parliament, which is dominated by Sisi loyalists, was elected in 2015, about a year after Sisi took office.

Since Sisi overthrew Morsi, Egypt has drawn heavy international criticism for its sweeping crackdown on dissent.

The authorities have jailed thousands of Morsi's supporters as well as liberal and secular activists, including a popular blogger, actors, singers and journalists.


'Dictatorship fit for Middle Ages'

As lawmakers debated the proposed changes, prominent dissident actors Khaled Abol Naga and Amr Waked denounced them as a power grab.

"These amendments would take us back to a dictatorship fit for the Middle Ages," Waked told a news conference by rights groups in Geneva.

His fellow actor criticised Sisi's narrative that his rule brought stability.

"Where is there stability in a country that jails children... that treats people badly or that kills?" he asked.

Amnesty International said that by approving the amendments, the parliamentarians had shown a "complete disregard for human rights".

"These amendments aim to expand military trials for civilians, undermine the independence of the judiciary, and strengthen impunity for human rights violations by members of the security forces," said Magdalena Mughrabi, Amnesty's deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa.

Ahead of the vote, Human Rights Watch said the amendments would "institutionalise authoritarianism".

When Sisi visited Washington for talks with US President Donald Trump last week, HRW urged Congress to withhold endorsement of his bid to extend his rule.

"Congress needs to use its levers to pressure the Egyptian president to reverse course, starting with withdrawing these constitutional amendments set to consolidate authoritarian rule," said HRW's Michael Page.

Other constitutional amendments include a quota for women's representation of no less than 25 percent in parliament and forming a second parliamentary chamber.

Source: https://www.france24.com/en/20190417-eg ... until-2030

Re: Egypt parliament votes to extend Sisi rule until 2030

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:02 am
by Hafiz
The eventual vote on his Presidential extension - broad definition - prohibited campaigning against it. That meant that the Parliament passed a law prohibiting all media and maybe even conversations/meetings/posters against it. The media and internet are controlled by the government and they did what they were told.

The police and prosecutors as in the past stopped campaigning against Sisi.

There was a 4 day gap between the Parliament passing the legislation and it being 'put' to the people and little warning in the media so the claimed 97% turnout is just impossible - some say a 7% turnout.

Such a law prohibiting campaigning against a proposal is illegal because it violates the constitution - not that any court would find that way. The actions of public officials to suppress comment are criminal offenses against the constitution.

That this Hitler like approach/results got no mention from the west is almost as bad as the efforts of the Egyptian MP's.

In truth it wasn't a vote it was a pre-planned landslide. With no one allowed to even speak against him he only got less than 40% of the electorate - a fit result and about Hitler's vote in 1933. These are his announced results so the truth is either lower or a lot lower - see WP article below.

People were bribed to vote. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... ency-cairo

A turgid but interesting attack on the vote and why the votes don't add up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... d0d02486b8

People forget the past - but not of course tourists who are infinitely well informed. Until about 2005 Mubarak stood for President but no one was allowed to stand against him. Again the west stayed silent and referred to Egypt as a democracy. Back to the past in a place where nothing changes until the guillotine (a great invention of the North of England) arrives.

Re: Egypt parliament votes to extend Sisi rule until 2030

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:26 am
by newcastle
My sympathy for the great unwashed of Egypt is waning. :(

Turkeys who vote for Christmas deserve to be stuffed.

Re: Egypt parliament votes to extend Sisi rule until 2030

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 6:01 pm
by carrie
What alternative have they Newcastle? The majority didn't vote at all.
They could I suppose start another revolution in which thousands would be killed, the Army wouldn't back them next time. Who is to take over if they were successful? Rather than turkeys voting for Christmas more like lambs to the slaughter.

Re: Egypt parliament votes to extend Sisi rule until 2030

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 11:12 pm
by newcastle
According to the official statistics (yes.....dubious) 88% voted yes on a turnout of 44%

Even allowing for creative accounting on the part of the electoral commission, it seems yes voters ( 23 million) outnumbered no voters (2 million) by quite a margin. No one forced people to vote.....and if they succumbed to bribes, more fool them.

I do agree that there’s no alternative to the current regime, but boycotting the referendum would have sent a signal that they’re not all “turkeys”.