Re: From the light into darkness: A Cataclysmic event ?
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:20 pm
I have already mentioned the obelisk that was brought out vertically in my second post.
"If you go to Aswan Quarry where the "unfinished" ( I use that term lightly, it is infact symbolic) Obelisk is, higher up that quarry, you will see a huge perfectly square hole,
and it is very deep. Some clever engineering was involved in not only cutting that stone, BUT drawing an obelisk out of the ground in an upright position, that's impossible to do today."
As for a guy moving an already pre positioned monolith, yes I did see it, and you don't need to be a mathematical or engineering genius to do that.
I was raised in the countryside, and trust me, although farming is a tough and hard life at times, necessity becomes the mother of invention, and you soon realise that Farmers are very clever people.
Now, if those lines of thinking could be augmented, then maybe we can find out how those huge monoliths were moved vast distance's instead of arguing about it.
However, the video still does not explain how the granite obelisks and statues were cut and shaped though.
Anyway, we were trying to see what caused the decline in Egypt, I had suggested a cataclysmic event,
but apparently that could not have happened because meteorites don't hit earth, especially an earth with highly civilised people occupying it.
So, if we try to examine the time line of the structures, then maybe we get a clue there ?
At some point, they stopped using Granite in the actual structure of the buildings, and reverted to Sandstone, a soft easy stone that CAN be carved with Bronze age tools.
The Temple of Isis does not contain granite in its structure, so perhaps that may operate as a starting point ?
A temple close to the source of granite does not employ the use of granite indicates to me that they could no longer cut or shape granite, but as we would expect, they have used sandstone instead, and indeed the build quality is good, as are the carvings.
I could even suggest that this happened elsewhere, where granite structures existed and sandstone structures were added to them later on ?
Many carvings on the Granite statues of Ramese2, are not of the same quality of the actual statue itself,
which makes me think another civilisation took ownership by writing on it, and maybe even distorted the meaning of what the statue represented. ?
Not just Rameses 2, but other smaller granite statues and carvings too.
can we even be sure the granite monoliths were originally erected with the carvings on them, or were they added later ?
So "perhaps" no cataclysmic event, but knowledge and skills were going into decline. Why ?
The Ancients it seems did encounter other peoples form other lands, maybe one of those encounters over time caused the decline. The Sea people ? The Greeks ?, or just bitter infighting amongst the ruling classes , whereby muscle beats brain's and wins, but ultimately without the brains, the civilisation descends into nothingness eventually ?
Which ever way it happened, and if the time lines are correct, then we today are a very long way behind where we should be, maybe by as much as 4000 years.
If we had been able to adopt the technologies the ancients had access to all those years ago, when Europeans first met up with the Egyptians, imagine where we would be today. !
"If you go to Aswan Quarry where the "unfinished" ( I use that term lightly, it is infact symbolic) Obelisk is, higher up that quarry, you will see a huge perfectly square hole,
and it is very deep. Some clever engineering was involved in not only cutting that stone, BUT drawing an obelisk out of the ground in an upright position, that's impossible to do today."
As for a guy moving an already pre positioned monolith, yes I did see it, and you don't need to be a mathematical or engineering genius to do that.
I was raised in the countryside, and trust me, although farming is a tough and hard life at times, necessity becomes the mother of invention, and you soon realise that Farmers are very clever people.
Now, if those lines of thinking could be augmented, then maybe we can find out how those huge monoliths were moved vast distance's instead of arguing about it.
However, the video still does not explain how the granite obelisks and statues were cut and shaped though.
Anyway, we were trying to see what caused the decline in Egypt, I had suggested a cataclysmic event,
but apparently that could not have happened because meteorites don't hit earth, especially an earth with highly civilised people occupying it.
So, if we try to examine the time line of the structures, then maybe we get a clue there ?
At some point, they stopped using Granite in the actual structure of the buildings, and reverted to Sandstone, a soft easy stone that CAN be carved with Bronze age tools.
The Temple of Isis does not contain granite in its structure, so perhaps that may operate as a starting point ?
A temple close to the source of granite does not employ the use of granite indicates to me that they could no longer cut or shape granite, but as we would expect, they have used sandstone instead, and indeed the build quality is good, as are the carvings.
I could even suggest that this happened elsewhere, where granite structures existed and sandstone structures were added to them later on ?
Many carvings on the Granite statues of Ramese2, are not of the same quality of the actual statue itself,
which makes me think another civilisation took ownership by writing on it, and maybe even distorted the meaning of what the statue represented. ?
Not just Rameses 2, but other smaller granite statues and carvings too.
can we even be sure the granite monoliths were originally erected with the carvings on them, or were they added later ?
So "perhaps" no cataclysmic event, but knowledge and skills were going into decline. Why ?
The Ancients it seems did encounter other peoples form other lands, maybe one of those encounters over time caused the decline. The Sea people ? The Greeks ?, or just bitter infighting amongst the ruling classes , whereby muscle beats brain's and wins, but ultimately without the brains, the civilisation descends into nothingness eventually ?
Which ever way it happened, and if the time lines are correct, then we today are a very long way behind where we should be, maybe by as much as 4000 years.
If we had been able to adopt the technologies the ancients had access to all those years ago, when Europeans first met up with the Egyptians, imagine where we would be today. !