Luxor4u

A-Four wrote:

A-Four wrote:I was in Austria last week, and from reading the news there, the Burqa is banned in that country as of either yesterday or today.

They would have you believe that Austria is a very modern forward thinking liberal country,......believe me, the majority of the people I come across there are very right wing, almost frightening.

Just to bring this subject back into the real world for perhaps a short while, I would simply like to add a few discoveries I made during my time in Austria and in Southern Germany.

When you look at the population of Austria, then realise how many refugees from Syria have been invited to settle in that country, it makes you wonder if it has learnt anything from the Hapsburg days or for that matter World War II.

When we now look at Baveria in Southern Germany, which has 10% of the population and holds the bank accounts of almost one third of the wealth of the whole of modern Germany, I discovered that little has changed there in attitude by its people since when I first visited there in the late 1970's. Believe me, even when I speak with the young people there, one would almost think Adolf Hitler had actually won the war.

When Mrs Merkel invited one million people from Syria to Germany, she expected those who had money to get on a aeroplane from there, in other words doctor, teachers, lawyers etc, that Germany desperately require. What she did not expect was that the poor were prepared to risk their life then walk thousands of miles, to the so called 'promised land'.

I was told by a senior financier there that Germany is the Euro, and every country that uses it is behold to Germany. A war won without even firing a gun. While the U.S.A. plays a game in the Pacific, it is China that is playing the German Euro game there, the frightening thing is that the U.S. has still to realise this.

Zooropa wrote:Foolish idiot.

A You Gov poll in 2016 found that 58% of the UK supported the ban whilst only 25% opposed it.

Newcastle just called more than half of Britain Islamophobic.

Oh dear! Will I be refused admittance now?

Now i know why hed rather attach himself to a family in another country to live with.

No you don't. The ugly nature of some elements of the UK public had little to do with it.

I wonder how many Islamophobes have treated him on his frequent visits to the motherland?

Most were coloured. Probably not islamophobes then (tends to be an old white male characteristic). An excellent Hindu surgeon. My GP's Iranian.

Horus wrote: Your pomposity really knows no bounds, the above self opinionated rant proves it, your ego soars well above any intellectual level you claim to have attained, you are clearly a legend in your own mind, do stop now before you display your ignorance even further.

newcastle wrote:

Horus wrote: Your pomposity really knows no bounds, the above self opinionated rant proves it, your ego soars well above any intellectual level you claim to have attained, you are clearly a legend in your own mind, do stop now before you display your ignorance even further.

How wounding

As ripostes go....2/10 I think would be generous.

Horus wrote:

newcastle wrote:

Horus wrote: Your pomposity really knows no bounds, the above self opinionated rant proves it, your ego soars well above any intellectual level you claim to have attained, you are clearly a legend in your own mind, do stop now before you display your ignorance even further.

How wounding

As ripostes go....2/10 I think would be generous.

Oh don’t be so hard on yourself, I would have given you at least a 3

Oh dear. Dont you know that the term "coloured" is considered at best very offensive and at worst a "racist" term?

Do you want to apologise to any members who may have been offended by that rather inconsiderate term?

By the way, the definition of racist is an attitude or judgement based on the grounds of colour it need not be a negative attitude either.

Horus wrote:I doubt that your arguments could actually win anything as it seems to be a case of mummy saying “ Oh look! The whole army is marching out of step apart from my little Newcastle”

newcastle wrote:

Oh dear. Dont you know that the term "coloured" is considered at best very offensive and at worst a "racist" term?

I take it we've moved on from islamophobia.

Apparently the correct term in the USA is ‘people of colour’. There is no meaningful semantic difference between ‘people of colour’ and ‘coloured people’. Why does one offend, then, when the other does not? Isn’t this a case of confected outrage and manufactured sensitivity?

Absolutely!

Well , you'd know more about that than most

Do you want to apologise to any members who may have been offended by that rather inconsiderate term?

NO.

By the way, the definition of racist is an attitude or judgement based on the grounds of colour it need not be a negative attitude either.

No it isn't.

"racist
noun
a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

adjective
showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another."

Try again.

Horus wrote:You are without a doubt a racist to describe a member of our ethnic community as being 'Coloured' is a typical racist remark, don’t you know we have moved on? The days of you expatriate colonialists treating the indigenous community where you live as ‘coloured’ “those darkies” has long gone and you have the temerity to lecture others, shame on you closet racist that you are.

Zooropa wrote:

newcastle wrote:

Oh dear. Dont you know that the term "coloured" is considered at best very offensive and at worst a "racist" term?

I take it we've moved on from islamophobia.

Apparently the correct term in the USA is ‘people of colour’. There is no meaningful semantic difference between ‘people of colour’ and ‘coloured people’. Why does one offend, then, when the other does not? Isn’t this a case of confected outrage and manufactured sensitivity?

Absolutely!

Well , you'd know more about that than most

Do you want to apologise to any members who may have been offended by that rather inconsiderate term?

NO.

By the way, the definition of racist is an attitude or judgement based on the grounds of colour it need not be a negative attitude either.

No it isn't.

"racist
noun
a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

adjective
showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another."

Try again.

Yes it is

"Racist"

"A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities"

You are a racist.

the definition of racist is an attitude or judgement based on the grounds of colour

newcastle wrote:

Horus wrote:You are without a doubt a racist to describe a member of our ethnic community as being 'Coloured' is a typical racist remark, don’t you know we have moved on? The days of you expatriate colonialists treating the indigenous community where you live as ‘coloured’ “those darkies” has long gone and you have the temerity to lecture others, shame on you closet racist that you are.

Just being silly now.

If "coloured" can be considered racist but "people of colour" is ok, then the language police are dancing on the head of a pin..

I'm not fussed.

Try again

newcastle wrote:

Horus wrote:You are without a doubt a racist to describe a member of our ethnic community as being 'Coloured' is a typical racist remark, don’t you know we have moved on? The days of you expatriate colonialists treating the indigenous community where you live as ‘coloured’ “those darkies” has long gone and you have the temerity to lecture others, shame on you closet racist that you are.

Just being silly now.

If "coloured" can be considered racist but "people of colour" is ok, then the language police are dancing on the head of a pin..

I'm not fussed.

Try again