The Sum Of Wall Fears.. For AkhonA'toun’s Femineity Denyers1

[Waael ebn Fekry]

Here presented is a draughted and shortened 1st part of an inspective morphological-study series under the full title: “The Sum Of WALL Fears And STATUA Awes, For Akhon-A'toun’s Femineity Denyers”. -- Of the quite numerous Akhon_A'toun-femininity-prooving categories of evidences, that were anciently and authentically produced in wall-and-statua-archaeology, the evidences category that this 1st part is centered-on is defined here as: "The Tall Queen's Consistent Choices Of Hollowed Headwears And Her Fairly-Big-And-Thick Hair !!".
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

P R E L U D E

The terribly unjustified deceptive-forged idea about Queen/ Akhon-A'toun_I .., as being herself King/ A'moun-Ĥotep_IV has very-negatively dawdled and tarried in the world of Egyptology in specific, and the world of Near-Eastern Civilizational Sciences in general, for tens of years, without any solid unquestionable proof. Generation after generation of Researchers, Scholars, Probers and Students, just kept on 'photo-copying' and 'phono-copying' the same old truth-contradicting and imaginary first-impressions, as they are, without subjecting them to an essential extensive analytical wide-view examination.

The morphological-study series named: “The Sum Of Wall Fears & Statua Awes, For Akhon-A'toun’s Femineity Denyers”, aims plainly at the worldly centuplication of the plural-awareness of Queen/ Akhon-A'toun’s Separate Individual Existance and her 'Beyond-Average' Femineity Reality, and thereby, the inauguration of new frontiers in probing and studying the earlier phases of the Modern State/Kingdom. Three very important examples that are mentionable here, are the three already-rising frontiers in probing, examining, studying and analyzing the ancient-global-history very rare experiences of establishing what seem like: A Stable And Enduring Feminal/Matronal Practical-Utopia (!), An All-Female 'Revolving' Board-Of-Rulers Governorship (!), And A Progressive Technocratic 'Republic-Like' Political System (!). .. What are truthful and 'earthly' of such only-lately-sensed astoundingly bizzare aspects of the Egyptian Mid-Country Liberal Cosmo-Tolerant A'tounian State, which its capital was the Tribal-Center-City: "Akhat-A'toun" ( = "Sister-Of-A'toun" ), are 'crying' to be probed, examined, studied and analyzed, right now. .. But the Deceptive and Forged "Masculinitized-Ruler" Idea, which is now awaiting from-day-to-day its utter deserved destruction, is hampering the rare push-forward for Egyptology, that is mentioned herewith.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


The Sum Of Wall Fears & Statua Awes, For Akhon-A'toun’s Femineity Deniers.1 :

The Tall Queen's Consistent Choices Of Hollowed Headwears And Her Fairly-Big-And-Thick Hair !!


The 'QUEEN' Akhon-A'toun_I .., always chose a few types only from more-than-a-dozen headwear types of the 18th Dynasty Period. .. Because she was not bald nor short-haired like the males of that time, and she normally enjoyed a female quite-long coarse hair, she consistently wore − of the Modern State/Kingdom headgears − the kinds that could hide the All, or at least the Most, of her somewhat bulky volume of hair. No matter the archaeological item is, a Wall-Relief or a Statuary-Sculpture, she was portrayed all-through in hundreds of examples while wearing exclusively hollowed headdresses, that each could contain a Good Mass Of Feminine Hair : −


1.A. The First Example is the Blue/Turquoise so-called "KHEPRESH" Headwear, which had been shaped somehow like a High-Turban or a Cook's 'Toque'. This one that had been used by Akhon-A'toun was a 'roomy' and very suitably-hollowed type of hat, for women of long-and-thick-hair in specific. Her female hair, "non problema" it was long and thick and shaggy, it could still be stuffed 'upwards' in the inside of this spacious kind : −

For photos Look : KHEPRESH, Akhon A'toun, at : 4shared

1.B. The Second Example is the Whitish so-called "ĤEDJET" Headwear, and the similar examples, which had been semi-conically-shaped like a Near-Eastern "Tartour". Remarkably, despite her slightly thin-looking head, the 'model' that was put-on by the Queen was about three-times as big as the normal-man's model (!), of course to be sufficient to contain her extra-average mass of hair : −

For photos Look : ĤEDJET, Akhon A'toun, at : 4shared


1.C. The Third Example is the Luminous Light-Bluish/or Else so-called "KHAT" Headwear, which had a very spacious baloony sac, for containing a lot of awesome hair (!), that draped backwards on the upper back. Most probably, because it was the most comfortable type of headdress for Akhon-A'toun and her bigger-than-medium mass of hair, she was shown wearing it in a great number of Wall-and-Statua Representations. A type like this one is still adopted by many scores of today's Egyptian Women (!) : −

For photos Look : KHAT, Akhon A'toun, at : 4shared


1.D. The Fourth Example is the Golden-With-Black-Stripes so-called "NEMES" Headwear, which had a suitable-for-men design, and was of quite little internal space for a Lady's well-sized hair. From a number of archaeological items, we are able to recognize how Akhon-A'toun dealt with that problem: Typical for her 'Liberal' personality, she dared to 'challenge' the Pharaonic-Constitutional Constrictions, and She let two very obvious inter-woven coarse hair clusters to 'Drop-Down' from the highly-respected royal headwear (!!). -- And it is an 'Unthinkable' ancient-happening, for the Akhon-A'toun’s Femineity Denyers, of course !! : −

For photos Look : NEMES, Akhon A'toun, at : 4shared


___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __ ___ __

A Quoted, Colleague-to-Colleague Closing Whisper :

“ People with this personality type are possessed by an idea. Almost always this idea has grown out of their entire life history. The interest began germinating when they were young. They then, more or less intuitively, put themselves through a long "apprenticeship" during which they mastered their field in great depth. They must know its history, people, institutions, anthropology, politics, and technology so well that they can see what the next historic step for the field is and how to bring it about. Their personality dictates that they pursue this path. ”

By: Darshan Patra, From: “According to Ashoka, What defines "entrepreneurial quality"?”

[Kevininabydos]

Okay, it is 01.45 UK time and I have just got back from the pub [yes they keep late hours down here in Cornwal! ] but WTF is this about? I will have to read this again tomorrow when the guiness has worn off!

[LivinginLuxor]

I think he's referring to a theory that Akhenaten was a woman. A theory for which there is no evidence. However, facts aren't really important when you have an interesting theory!

[Bullet Magnet]

Akhenaten is the one study that will bite the Egyptologists on the backside one day..

[Bullet Magnet]

Akhenaten is the one study that will bite the Egyptologists on the backside one day..

[Waael ebn Fekry]

Ĥoureyya's Many Mentionings/The Pregnancy Snapshot!!-2

Respectable Truth-Demanders/Egyptologists, At Luxor4U & Anywhere,

In our ancient-civilizations career, a single photograph for a single artifact can, in some less-than-frequent cases, be more informative or more assertive to a certain topic, than the whole of a 3-inch-thick album, that is full of dozens of photographs for miscellaneous artifacts. The single photograph for the single artifact shown, that is e-linked herewith, compose together definitely an utterly surprising example on that one-of-a-kind of very superb precious archaeological evidences. Sufficiently with it, you will know surely that I had been honestly striving in a righteous direction for 10 weeks, all right, to exhibit what is in the domain of ''The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But The Truth'' to you all, at the dynamic and respectable "Luxor For You" Egyptology Forum, about the femaleness of a numerously-mentioned and well-attested Egyptian Queen.

I have discovered this 'Landsliding Evidence/Proof', on the femininity of "Queen"/ Akhon-Ātoan; Akhen_Kherses; Aken_Kheres; Ĥoureyya; Khoureyya; A'Kherres; Ĥorreyya, nearly a month ago, and It Is the one that is referred-to in my ANECF articles: "Ĥoureyya's Many Mentionings/The Pregnancy Snapshot!!.1" of Friday April 6, at 21:43, and "Re: Ĥoureyya's Many Mentionings/The Pregnancy Snapshot!!.1" of Monday April 9, at 23:10. As I have described it before: "A snapshot of a lithic formal recording of a Huge Monarchial Pregnancy, at possibly the eighth month, with the bright/white Ĥedjet Crown itself atop the Akhat-A'tounian queen's head, amidst the usual representation of the dispersed rays of the high ancestor A'toun son-of Ĥorr" !!!

It is understandable that a 'conventionalist' or a 'mainstreamist' in Egyptology, who was till this moment still 'faithful' to the belief in an existence of a Male-King-Akhenaten, could judge this 'unbeatable' evidence as an 'unthinkable' one. But in such similar cases I think one should start revising the mis-led personal stances at once or relatively quickly, so as to lessen the from-previous accumulated damages that had happened because of the 'automatic' copying from other un-careful hasty sources.

And right now, 'here you are', Gentlewomen and Gentlemen: It Is within the reach of your careful and knowledgeable hands, and It Is handed over to your enthusiastic and science-motivated examination, through the e-linkage of this article, at the internet-web 'image' search title: " Pregnant Akhon-A'toun Lithic Snapshot ".

Very obvious in the bas-relief imaging art of this ultimately special artifact, we find a very unique and a very rare representation of the 'Egyptian Pregnancy Robe', which, with the very same shape that is shown, is still very widely used in the whole of Egypt till today !! Notice how it is cut short near the knees level, for facilitating movement of the temporarily constricted legs and for allowing air flow to the abdomen, hips, thighs, … etc., of the later-months pregnant woman. Without any alterations, what-so-ever, the robe of Akhon-Ātoan shown in this lithic pregnancy snapshot is Exactly the same as "el-Gallabeyyah el-Osayyarah" [ = "the Short Robe" ], which is a name that is commonly used between the Egyptian Women to somewhat 'indirectly' identify their most usual pregnancy-time wearing.

[Aromagician]

Hmm interesting, so was Nefertiti male?

Often images were shown to portray symbolically the essence of a person. Many indian Gurus and even buddha were shown with protruding bellies, not because they were pregnant but as a symbol of their spiritual power.

Showing a man loking feminine can also show that they have both sides of their natures the male and female combined.

Queen Hatshepsut was a King, yet they did not need to hide the fact she was a woman, so why would they do it with Akhenaton if that was the case?

[Waael ebn Fekry]

The Crucial Distinction Of Masculinity And Femininity In Ancient Egypt / THE PREGNANCY SNAPSHOT !!

Wait a five minutes here: We have inside the 'Isle Of Britannia' the typical English People in the South and the typical Scottish People in the North, separated by a few tens of miles. But yet, you cannot say that these 'Two-Neighbours' of peoples: speak, nor eat, nor build, nor dance, nor wear like each other. There are Gross differences between the two peoples even in some 'natural' practices, and you cannot measure one of them with the other in many aspects, despite they both live chiefly inside The Same Island !! So from where did you 'acquire' that pseudo-civilizational fantastic fancy logic, which permits you to say if something 'peculiar' was done in India, then likely it was done also in Egypt (!!), specially when I 'inform' you that these two countries lay thousands of miles away from each other ?! Do you really believe that an 'unnatural' practice of Ancient India like that you have mentioned was practiced Half-A-Continent away, in Ancient Egypt ?!

And even yet more, Egypt's society in the past was, and in the present is, concerned about the Human-Male's Masculinity as being very valuable, very important, very respectable, so worthy of assertion, so worthy of enhancement. Likewise, Egypt's society in the past was, and in the present is, concerned about the Human-Female's Femininity as being very valuable, very important, very respectable, so worthy of assertion, so worthy of enhancement. Sortingly and quantitatively, in the 2D and 3D personae-images in what had reached us of the Ancient Egyptian archaeology, we can find what is A Number Of Times More Than Enough to affirm and to assent the validity of this 'Crucial' concept/comprehension, for Ancient Egypt's society.


Whether the 'Mainstreamists' like it or not, and whether the 'Conventionalists' find it unthinkable or not :

THE UNCOVERED AND PRESENTED 'PREGNANCY LITHIC SNAPSHOT' IS SURELY AN UNBEATABLE LANDSLIDING EVIDENCE-AND-PROOF, ON THE FEMINEITY AND THE MATRONSHIP AND THE MATRIARCHY OF QUEEN/ AKHEN-ĀTOAN_I, AND IT REPRESENTS A FRAGMANT OF ARTIFACT THAT ARCHAEOLOGICALLY IMPLIES AND ASSERTS THAT SAME REALITY-REALISATION, WHICH PREVIOUSLY WAS SHOWN AND RELAYED BY MANY OTHER PIECES OF THE AKHEN-ĀTOANIAN ARCHAEOLOGY.


To view this very special proof/evidence, write in the internet search box: "Pregnant Akhon-A'toun Lithic Snapshot"

[Waael ebn Fekry]

Femineity of Akhen-Ātoan’s Regime Apex/Archaeoproofs1

There are a series of some photographic e-galleries for a chosen collection of archaeological samples, that I am compiling on the internet-web, to prove a number of the 'feminility' crucial points :

1- The patient meticulous 'hyper-detailed' inspection of Akhen-Ātoan's personal 2D and 3D images, among the comparable images of the other contemporaneous women in the 2nd half-period of Dynasty_18, prove that she was physically 'A Woman' just like the rest of them all in the Akhat-Ātoanian feminized regime-summit, with the following unsuspected features of sheer femininity, that are : (a) the same seducing voluptuous shape of a "Coca-Cola"-bottle type of body, with respect to her superb younger-years general physique of 'undulating' outer-lines and bulbous surfaces ; (b) the same big thick coarse and long type of hair, which when it was unbounded could cascade till the curvatures of her breasts ; (c) the same swollen spheri-conical temporary forms of the Areolar/Lobular parts of the post-pregnancy-and-milk-feeding-time breasts ; (d) the same softly cushioned palms of perfectly feminine hands ; (e) the same non-existence of any penis and any scrutum/testicles ; (f) the same soft luscious flattened small-thickness feet, with the characteristic low-height Navicular/Talonavicular bone-parts.

2- And all that is in addition to the purely-feminine accessories, that were repeatedly put-on by Akhen-Ātoan, like: (a) The colourful hyper-elaborate composite type of a widened half-circular necklace ; (b) Pairs of 1-inch+ thick rounded-ended seal-logs, stamped with different cartouches and strapped to her trunk ; (c) Pairs of 1-inch+ thick rounded-ended seal-logs, stamped with different cartouches and strapped to her upper arms and lower arms ; d) A pair of circular earrings ejecting-out from her ears, that which were shaped like some "beech-buggy" tires, with convex-formed surfaces of the outer thickness dimensions.

So, archaeologically speaking, She Was Definitely 'A Woman', who thereby had repeated the same gross mistake of Queen/ Ĥat-Shep-Sout, who also had previously violated the Egyptian 'kingship' constitution, by assuming the position of a Full-Pharaoh, for some while, until the 'negative' destructive signs came about. Naturally, the Egyptians later treated Akhen-Ātoan's artifacts like they had formerly treated those of Ĥat-Shep-Sout, when the time came to punish her for her throne-usurpation. Cracking and defacing Akhen-Ātoan's crafted images Is In Itself another clue about her well-attested obvious feminility.

[LivinginLuxor]

So, relying on artistic portrayals, you must also come to the conclusion that Hatshepsut was a man? Why have you ignored the portrayal in the tomb of Kheruef and the statues predating the Amarna revolution?

I'd love to see some of your evidence, but you place no citations to your site, or any other in your posts.

[Waael ebn Fekry]

Too Too Many 2D and 3D Artifacts Attesting Akhen's Reality

LivinginLuxor, you said: " So, relying on artistic portrayals, you must also ... ".

You are making a too much exaggerated expression, that will not score any points to your unbudgeable "Avant Garde"-Like opinion about Queen/ Akhen-Ātoan. If you are not sarcastic and you really disbelieve in any information to be deduced from All Items Of The Artistic Production Of Ancient Egypt, on the basis that what they present are just and only "artistic portrayals", then how can the Egyptologists 'follow you' and afford to subtract all the visually-driven information, that were derived from the Ancient Egyptian archaeology in general ?! Can you tell me what will be left for them then, and how small is it in comparison to what they do have now, mainly because they generally 'Believe', in the credibility and the authenticity of so much of what is presented to them by the Ancient Egyptian Artifact Makers ?! -- Therefore, your exaggerated " relying on artistic portrayals ... ". expression should not be used, from the beginning, I am sorry to say.

Your very unique and very special example of: " ... that Hatshepsut was a man? ... "., is actually Inverted, by Ĥat-Shep-Sout's obvious trying to 'masculinitize' [ not 'feminilitize' ] herself a little, so that in the pharaonic formal processions her appearances and 'looks' would become 'More Legitimate'. Do not say to yourself, please, that the Egyptians then were 'deceived' and were convinced that she was not a full female !! Remember that, constitutionally, the Pharaoh had to be a 'Male', and if not and is in fact a 'Female', there was a need for a "Co-Rex", so that the throne-situation could be legitimized. This specific example of Queen/ Ĥat-Shep-Sout, actually proves the contrary of your general argument, and adds support to my theory, because the artifacts of both 'Women' and both 'Queens' were intensely defaced and havocked, exactly like each other, because of their portrayed 'anti-constitutional' femaleness, and especially when this femaleness was excessively and teasingly exhibited upon the public. Some Egyptologists have cleverly and accurately noticed that if the femaleness of a queen was portrayed at other situations, that are different from those of "Pharaoh-ship", the artifacts then, in many cases of these types of other situations, were spared and were not subjected to mutilation and demolition !!

You thankfully mentioned: " the portrayal in the tomb of Kheruef ... ", which I have been faced-with previously by another noted Egyptologist, during the last Spring ! My answer to her will probably surprize you, like it had apparently surprized her before. -- She quickly ignored that example altogether !! -- It would be very interesting and very instructive if I can post it again with an archaeological photograph or two for the Kheruef tomb walls, that are visible to you and many other subscribers, on the forum. If you can do this favour to me, or at least post a substitution link, then I express my gratitude to you. -- Unfortunately, this forum does not permit URLs for some time, for the new subscribers like me.

You thankfully also mentioned: " the statues predating the Amarna ... ". These statues, specifically, are very important in proving the "Bi-Personae"/"Bi-Genders" side of my theory. Through a serious, patient and 'unbiased' examination of them, and then comparing them to the later ones, the Egyptologists should be able, eventually, to segregate those that belong to King/ Āmoan-Ĥāţep_IV from those that belong to Queen/ Akhen-Ātoan_I. -- There are many many differences between the two categories, which you can find easily for yourself. Some swift examples, as 'appetizers' for you here are: (a) The incredible difference in total heights ; (b) Her pitched straight nose, and His vaulted ball-tipped nose ; (c) Her elongated oblong shaped skull, and His spheri-cylindrical shaped skull ; (d) Her thin triangular chin, and His half-egg shaped chin ; (e) Her oval thin face, and His circular wide face ; (f) Her scrawny long neck, and His thick short neck ; (g) Her long-hair/huge-sized Khepresh crown, and His short-hair/tiny-sized Khepresh crown ; ... etc., etc., etc.

Thanks Cordially For Your Interest In The Interesting Subject !!