Page 1 of 1
Hands of the Ripper ? 'not quite.......
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:56 pm
by Who2
These, are the hands of Howard Carter, at the time of this photographic exposure, they were being used by one
'Arthur Weigall:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Weigall
'Who' was at that time, 'hot on the trail of tomb robbers even, titled one's..........
PS: One' wouldn't expect a famous actor using his own hands, far too 'menial .........
Re: Hands of the Ripper ? 'not quite.......
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:59 am
by LivinginLuxor
Amazing - I never realised that colour photography of that quality was around in 1922! Clearly the camera in the Carter House is an anachronism!
Re: Hands of the Ripper ? 'not quite.......
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:06 am
by Who2
"Clearly the camera in the Carter House is an Anachronism!
Clearly, I reckon it's a Kodak......
PS: Tom Cruise has aged, I reckon too much scientooloogy Ron L Cruise......
PSS: Thomas Cruise Mapother IV born July 3, 1962
Re: Hands of the Ripper ? 'not quite.......
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:16 am
by Who2
Did you here the one about them wanting us Kino Kinema as 'white film extras starting today for an egyptian
'No - name film about tourists getting kidnapped starting in karnack, on the bridge and ending up in hatshepsuit, 'tasteful' someone rightly remarked, no-wardrobe, no budget, and only 150 le presidiums a day for a 3 day shoot.
Tight buggers beware of 'geeks bearing gifts, "but george, it will be fun' oh! yeh, 'done a lot of acting have we' ?...
And I've got a scorpion in the plunge pool.la whaala'
