God bless you for your endeavours which enriched our world.

Moderators: DJKeefy, 4u Network
It is a bit odd. Maybe this "omission" might be rectified when the centenary of his major discovery comes around.Horus wrote:And how sad that there is no lasting memorial to him in the UK.
Although I don't think the powers that be in Egypt would be interested in a statue, you have, of course, the Carter House museum and its collection of memorabilia (little of which is actually authentic). It's an interesting, and relaxing, spot....with only a few visitors each day.Horus wrote:No there is not a lasting monument to him MT, that is simply the headstone on his grave. What we are saying is that there is no official monument in his honour in the UK, very remiss when you consider his world fame and see all the others that seem to spring up to all and sundry.
Apart from any doubts the "establishment" might have had over his worthiness for the honour of a knighthood, the fact that he is deceased precludes this.Today, it would be fantastic , after all those years he was in Egypt, to now see a room in a museum, whether in London or New York with a name over the door reading Sir Howard Carter collection., are some of you still wondering why this is not so ?
His grave was much neglected until 1992, the year of the BM exhibition mentioned by A-Four. The headstone was barely legibleHorus wrote:No there is not a lasting monument to him MT, that is simply the headstone on his grave. What we are saying is that there is no official monument in his honour in the UK, very remiss when you consider his world fame and see all the others that seem to spring up to all and sundry.
And of course they cease with death, so it always amuses me when calls are made to remove someones knighthood as in the case of Jimmy Saville.the fact that he is deceased precludes this. Knighthoods cannot be awarded to the dead.
Evidently I have not made my point in this matter clear. Up until the discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamoun Carter's main occupation in Luxor was as a dealer in the buying and selling of antiquities. Many remarkable pieces went through his hands, and in most cases he sold only to the highest bidder. J.P.Morgan, who almost single handledly build up the Metropolitan Museum in New York was a favourite customer of Mr Carter.A-Four wrote: Today, it would be fantastic , after all those years he was in Egypt, to now see a room in a museum, whether in London or New York with a name over the door reading Sir Howard Carter collection., are some of you still wondering why this is not so ?
A somewhat unfair appraisal of a man who :Carter did not give a hoot for Egyptology,.......but then again Carter was no archeologyist (sic)
Indeed he didn't....which is may be the reason why he was overlooked for academic honours. And without patronage from academia it's unlikely that his name would have been but forward for national honours.Winged Isis wrote:Despite his wide knowledge and experience, he had no academic qualifications, especially in Egyptology, and always felt inferior for the lack.
Horus makes a fantastic statement here, that many people of the modern age have questioned. Those who have witnessed the 'voice' of Howard Carter during there visit to Carter House would think he has the voice of the present day Prince Michael of Kent. All this is false like much of what we know today of The man Carter.Horus wrote:Summed up quite nicely, what do you need to do to be described as an Egyptologist? By applying the same criticisms handed out to Carter to others, then many of histories and today’s more famous TV faces faces would not qualify on that count.