Tourism Has A Price.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 9:20 am
Tourism Has A Price.
In some places the price is 100% of the citizen’s assets or taking away the natural and free assets/resources of their own country. For others there is the exclusion of locals and all the benefit/theft of resources/nature going to the tourist or the many crooks/murderers/the army who are the backbone of the Egyptian tourism industry.
Of course the informed forum members whose love of Egypt is unqualified by reality know that there are no disadvantages for Egyptians from Tourism and suggestions that is the case are lies – or just unhelpful for those with financial interests in Egyptian tourism.
Take beaches. Tourists of great moral sensitivity and compassion lounge on them but where do they come from, who were they stolen from and can the local Egyptians use them?
We are unclear about how much has been sold/given/rented/stolen/bribed to some of the least impressive/low rent hotel chains/worst hotels in the world but here is a start.
“In Ras Gharib, on the Red Sea, only one public beach was available to the locals, but after 12 people drowned last summer (2015) with no lifeguard on site, the authorities were forced to shut the beach down. The other beaches in the area are mostly occupied by oil companies and are therefore polluted and unsuitable for swimming.” They didn’t provide a life guard for locals just closed it.
“Hurghada used to have 10 public beaches, but they have been rented to private companies, depriving the locals of free access to the waterfront. This phenomenon has carried over to the public beaches in Safaga, Quseir, Marsa Alam, Halayeb and Shalatin.”
“Ain Sokhna is yet another coastal town where all the beaches over a stretch of 200 kilometers are owned by hotels and compounds, except for one in Adabiya, close to Suez.” – which from memory is filthy.
“Public beaches have disappeared in Sharm El-Sheikh, Dahab and Ras Sedr. In fact, certain private beaches have annexed natural reserves, such as a beach in Dahab that contains rare plants. “The Dahab reserve was once protected by the European Commission,” said Mohsen Gafar, a resident of Dahab. “Now it is part of a private beach.”
“Over a stretch of 600 kilometers, the beaches of southern Sinai are restricted to tourists and hotel guests, while the ordinary citizen is deprived of them.”
“Zidane Nafie, head of the “Sons of Sharm El-Sheikh Association,” said the City Council has rented the public beach for LE1.2 million a year. “The entrance fee is LE150 per person,” he said. “ That’s the income from 6,500 beached whales to cover the yearly rental – gross, including the whales. 20 a day on average each requiring a lifeguard with a 20 ton dredge to drag them in.
“Ahmed Atef works in a hotel in Sharm El-Sheikh. He said staff members are not allowed to use the beach. “Where can I take my family if there is no public beach anymore,” he said.” As if your boss cares – its up to him who gets in and he won’t let you in even if you had money.
One could go on for ages but you get my point and that the rentals are trivial, the taxpayer thieved, rich made richer and locals warded off. Nevertheless those paragons of virtue who know all of Egypt probably have a different view – but possibly not based on evidence and logic.
Of course there are other opinions and I’ve seen Egyptian men crouched up against the fences on Sharm getting very excited in their dozens whilst the tourist police look on or just snooze or take bribes for not running them in.
The President made a big issue of evicting thousands from land close to the Nile – but not military clubs, not military hotels, not the clubs owned by the police or other connected groups and not rich investors – just poor and ordinary people. In addition having a legal right to frontage or islands is irrelevant because the police/army just ignore court orders/decisions that give property rights to the residents. Who gets these prime assets after the evictions I leave to your imagination just as I leave the beneficiary of the payment made for them.
The general rule in Egypt is if you are poor sitting on a valuable asset – get out.
That ‘strong’ approach seems to also not apply to the current beach hotels owned by corrupt people who got the land in dubious circumstances and utilities at cut price. Many, its unclear, also got tax exemptions for substantial periods. So on the coast it’s the wild west and the taxpayer gets little – sometimes less than nothing.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/ ... =firefox-b and https://www.eturbonews.com/226271/touri ... r-visitors and on the Nile https://madamasr.com/en/2017/07/16/feat ... -the-nile/ and https://www.france24.com/en/20170727-ca ... on-efforts
With the hundreds of hotels/compounds on the North Coast (many army owned holiday compounds or army hotels) all have beaches closed to the public.
As if the Junta of Egypt ever cared about the rights of mere citizens let alone those who are not rich. Their 70 year track record on the environment/nature is probably a winner - maybe the worst in the world.
Maybe tourists with a conscience could think of this – when they sober up or if they can be bothered to consider that their comfort is on a foundation of thievery and excluding locals.
In some places the price is 100% of the citizen’s assets or taking away the natural and free assets/resources of their own country. For others there is the exclusion of locals and all the benefit/theft of resources/nature going to the tourist or the many crooks/murderers/the army who are the backbone of the Egyptian tourism industry.
Of course the informed forum members whose love of Egypt is unqualified by reality know that there are no disadvantages for Egyptians from Tourism and suggestions that is the case are lies – or just unhelpful for those with financial interests in Egyptian tourism.
Take beaches. Tourists of great moral sensitivity and compassion lounge on them but where do they come from, who were they stolen from and can the local Egyptians use them?
We are unclear about how much has been sold/given/rented/stolen/bribed to some of the least impressive/low rent hotel chains/worst hotels in the world but here is a start.
“In Ras Gharib, on the Red Sea, only one public beach was available to the locals, but after 12 people drowned last summer (2015) with no lifeguard on site, the authorities were forced to shut the beach down. The other beaches in the area are mostly occupied by oil companies and are therefore polluted and unsuitable for swimming.” They didn’t provide a life guard for locals just closed it.
“Hurghada used to have 10 public beaches, but they have been rented to private companies, depriving the locals of free access to the waterfront. This phenomenon has carried over to the public beaches in Safaga, Quseir, Marsa Alam, Halayeb and Shalatin.”
“Ain Sokhna is yet another coastal town where all the beaches over a stretch of 200 kilometers are owned by hotels and compounds, except for one in Adabiya, close to Suez.” – which from memory is filthy.
“Public beaches have disappeared in Sharm El-Sheikh, Dahab and Ras Sedr. In fact, certain private beaches have annexed natural reserves, such as a beach in Dahab that contains rare plants. “The Dahab reserve was once protected by the European Commission,” said Mohsen Gafar, a resident of Dahab. “Now it is part of a private beach.”
“Over a stretch of 600 kilometers, the beaches of southern Sinai are restricted to tourists and hotel guests, while the ordinary citizen is deprived of them.”
“Zidane Nafie, head of the “Sons of Sharm El-Sheikh Association,” said the City Council has rented the public beach for LE1.2 million a year. “The entrance fee is LE150 per person,” he said. “ That’s the income from 6,500 beached whales to cover the yearly rental – gross, including the whales. 20 a day on average each requiring a lifeguard with a 20 ton dredge to drag them in.
“Ahmed Atef works in a hotel in Sharm El-Sheikh. He said staff members are not allowed to use the beach. “Where can I take my family if there is no public beach anymore,” he said.” As if your boss cares – its up to him who gets in and he won’t let you in even if you had money.
One could go on for ages but you get my point and that the rentals are trivial, the taxpayer thieved, rich made richer and locals warded off. Nevertheless those paragons of virtue who know all of Egypt probably have a different view – but possibly not based on evidence and logic.
Of course there are other opinions and I’ve seen Egyptian men crouched up against the fences on Sharm getting very excited in their dozens whilst the tourist police look on or just snooze or take bribes for not running them in.
The President made a big issue of evicting thousands from land close to the Nile – but not military clubs, not military hotels, not the clubs owned by the police or other connected groups and not rich investors – just poor and ordinary people. In addition having a legal right to frontage or islands is irrelevant because the police/army just ignore court orders/decisions that give property rights to the residents. Who gets these prime assets after the evictions I leave to your imagination just as I leave the beneficiary of the payment made for them.
The general rule in Egypt is if you are poor sitting on a valuable asset – get out.
That ‘strong’ approach seems to also not apply to the current beach hotels owned by corrupt people who got the land in dubious circumstances and utilities at cut price. Many, its unclear, also got tax exemptions for substantial periods. So on the coast it’s the wild west and the taxpayer gets little – sometimes less than nothing.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/ ... =firefox-b and https://www.eturbonews.com/226271/touri ... r-visitors and on the Nile https://madamasr.com/en/2017/07/16/feat ... -the-nile/ and https://www.france24.com/en/20170727-ca ... on-efforts
With the hundreds of hotels/compounds on the North Coast (many army owned holiday compounds or army hotels) all have beaches closed to the public.
As if the Junta of Egypt ever cared about the rights of mere citizens let alone those who are not rich. Their 70 year track record on the environment/nature is probably a winner - maybe the worst in the world.
Maybe tourists with a conscience could think of this – when they sober up or if they can be bothered to consider that their comfort is on a foundation of thievery and excluding locals.